Journal of Acute Care

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2024 ) > List of Articles

PRO-CON

Blenderized Kitchen Feeds vs Scientific Formula Feeds in the Intensive Care Unit: State of the Art

Sanjith Saseedharan

Keywords : Critically ill patients, Intensive care units, Intensivist

Citation Information : Saseedharan S. Blenderized Kitchen Feeds vs Scientific Formula Feeds in the Intensive Care Unit: State of the Art. 2024; 3 (2):97-100.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10089-0110

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 19-08-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Tube feeding via enteral access tubes is very commonplace in healthcare and home care settings. However, for various reasons, the majority of the world relies on blenderized kitchen feeds prepared in home kitchens or hospital kitchens. This state-of-the-art review explains in detail the benefits, risks, complications, advantages, and disadvantages of using blenderized tube feeding and commercial feeding formulas and provides suggestions after presenting the evidence in this regard.


PDF Share
  1. Jolfaie NR, Rouhani MH, Mirlohi M, et al. Comparison of energy and nutrient contents of commercial and noncommercial enteral nutrition solutions. Adv Biomed Res 2017;6:131. DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.216784
  2. Vieira MMC, Santos VFN, Bottoni A, et al. Nutritional and microbiological quality of commercial and homemade blenderized whole food enteral diets for home-based enteral nutritional therapy in adults. Clin Nutr 2018;37(1):177–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.11.020
  3. Mokhalalati JK, Druyan ME, Shott SB, et al. Microbial, nutritional and physical quality of commercial and hospital prepared tube feedings in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2004;25(3):331–341. PMID: 15048172.
  4. Sullivan MM, Sorreda–Esguerra P, Santos EE, et al. Bacterial contamination of blenderized whole food and commercial enteral tube feedings in the Philippines. J Hosp Infect 2001;49(4):268–273. DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1093
  5. Borghi R, Dutra Araujo T, Airoldi Vieira RI, et al. ILSI task force on enteral nutrition; estimated composition and costs of blenderized diets. Nutr Hosp 2013;28(6):2033–2038. PMID: 24506385.
  6. Weston SC, Crespo A, Harwin C. Stir, shake or blend: a comparison of methods used to reduce viscosity of blenderized tube feedings. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2022;75(1):110–112. DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003479
  7. Uniat KC, Stangarlin-Fiori L, Krüger JF, et al. Microbiological quality of enteral formulations handled at home: a systematic review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2022;46(8):1787–1796. DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2432
  8. Ojo O, Adegboye ARA, Ojo OO, et al. The microbial quality and safety of blenderised enteral nutrition formula: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(24):9563. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249563
  9. Mezzomo TR, Fiori LS, de Oliveira Reis L, et al. Nutritional composition and cost of home-prepared enteral tube feeding. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2021;42:393–399. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.12.016
  10. Oparaji JA, Sferra T, Sankararaman S. Basics of blenderized tube feeds: a primer for pediatric primary care clinicians. Gastroenterology Res 2019;12(3):111–114. DOI: 10.14740/gr1192
  11. Sanjith S, Apoorv T, Shah N. Cost of enteral formulae feed in critically ill patients in a tertiary care centre: an observational study from India. Indian J Nutr 2019;6(3):207. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9600-C6-105
  12. Henrikson A, Desai A, Allen F, et al. Cost savings associated with commercial blenderized tube feeding formulas in post-acute care adult patients. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN 2023;54:704. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.09.717
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.