Journal of Acute Care

Register      Login

VOLUME 1 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Septic Shock: First Fill the Pipes Up

Keywords : Intravenous fluid, Septic shock, Vasopressors

Citation Information : Septic Shock: First Fill the Pipes Up. 2022; 1 (3):143-145.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10089-0049

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 03-05-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


The rationale for fluid resuscitation is to increase mean systemic filling pressure (Pmsf), venous return, and cardiac output by increasing circulatory stressed volume. However, several conditions must be fulfilled to achieve desirable outcomes from fluid resuscitation. Vasopressors are also important components of resuscitation in septic shock and can potentially supplement the beneficial effects of fluid. However, the potential benefits of vasopressors must be weighed against several harms associated with vasopressors. Risks associated with vasopressors are more pronounced with underfilling of circulation and in higher doses. Current physiological and clinical evidence supports intravenous fluids as the first-line resuscitation agent in septic shock, with vasopressor infusion as a supplement to the same.

  1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020;395(10219):200–211. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7
  2. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2021;47(11):1181–1247. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337
  3. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, et al. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011;39(2):259–265. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feeb15
  4. Hernández G, Teboul JL. Is the macrocirculation really dissociated from the microcirculation in septic shock? Intensive Care Med 2016;42(10):1621–1624. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4416-2
  5. Guyton AC, Coleman TG, Granger HJ. Circulation: overall regulation. Annu Rev Physiol. 1972;34:13–46. DOI: 10.1146/
  6. Malbrain MLNG, Van Regenmortel N, Saugel B, et al. Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D's and the four phases of fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2018;8(1):66. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-018-0402-x
  7. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, et al. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009;37(9):2642–2647. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da
  8. Nunes TS, Ladeira RT, Bafi AT, et al. Duration of hemodynamic effects of crystalloids in patients with circulatory shock after initial resuscitation. Ann Intensive Care 2014;4:25. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-014-0025-9
  9. Bai X, Yu W, Ji W, et al. Early versus delayed administration of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock. Crit Care 2014;18(5):532. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-014-0532-y
  10. Persichini R, Silva S, Teboul JL, et al. Effects of norepinephrine on mean systemic pressure and venous return in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2012;40(12):3146–3153. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318260c6c3
  11. Permpikul C, Tongyoo S, Viarasilpa T, et al. Early use of norepinephrine in septic shock resuscitation (CENSER). A randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;199(9):1097–1105. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201806-1034OC
  12. Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, et al. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014;370(17):1583–1593. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312173
  13. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med 2010;362(9):779–789. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118
  14. Myburgh JA, Higgins A, Jovanovska A, et al. A comparison of epinephrine and norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2008;34(12):2226–2234. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1219-0
  15. Waechter J, Kumar A, Lapinsky SE, et al. Interaction between fluids and vasoactive agents on mortality in septic shock: a multicenter, observational study. Crit Care Med 2014;42(10):2158–2168. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000520
  16. Roberts RJ, Miano TA, Hammond DA, et al. Evaluation of vasopressor exposure and mortality in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med 2020;48(10):1445–1453. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004476
  17. Latta TA. Saline venous injection in cases of malignant cholera, performed while in the vapour-bath. Lancet 1832;19(480):208–209. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)95140-8
  18. Aya HD, Rhodes A, Chis Ster I, et al. Hemodynamic effect of different doses of fluids for a fluid challenge: a quasi-randomized controlled study. Crit Care Med 2017;45(2):e161–e168. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002067
  19. Ghosh S. Concept of fluid responsiveness. fluid challenge. in: handbook of intravenous fluids. 2022 Springer, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-0500-1_9
  20. Macdonald SPJ, Keijzers G, Taylor DM, et al. Restricted fluid resuscitation in suspected sepsis associated hypotension (REFRESH): a pilot randomised controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 2018;44(12):2070–2078. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5433-0
  21. Karpati PCJ, Rossignol M, Pirot M, et al. High Incidence of myocardial ischemia during postpartum hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 2004;100(1):30–36. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200401000-00009
  22. Ospina-Tascón GA, Teboul JL, Hernandez G, et al. Diastolic shock index and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. Ann Intensive Care 2020;10(1):41. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00658-8
  23. Mårtensson J, Bihari S, Bannard-Smith J, et al. Small volume resuscitation with 20% albumin in intensive care: physiological effects: the SWIPE randomised clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 2018;44(11):1797–1806. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5253-2
  24. Van Regenmortel N, Verbrugghe W, Roelant E, et al. Maintenance fluid therapy and fluid creep impose more significant fluid, sodium, and chloride burdens than resuscitation fluids in critically ill patients: a retrospective study in a tertiary mixed ICU population. Intensive Care Med 2018;44(4):409–417. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5147-3
  25. Van Regenmortel N, Hendrickx S, Roelant E, et al. 154 compared to 54 mmol per liter of sodium in intravenous maintenance fluid therapy for adult patients undergoing major thoracic surgery (TOPMAST): a single-center randomized controlled double-blind trial. Intensive Care Med 2019;45:1422–1432. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05772-1
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.